The group actions and dynamics were awesome in Group 32. We met about about once a week and this past week, about 3 times. Each meeting varied in length between twenty minutes and four hours. Each person had a different assigned portion of the report, although we all helped find the links. We considered about three or four different articles but we decided on the article that covered a range of topics involving our subject. Our group spent about two hours in the computer lab dealing with that. We encountered many different experiences: mostly on compromising time schedules. The advantages of the group project were that we met more people to study with and we learned about our topic more in depthly. We all agree that this was a good experience, but some revisions may be more helpful. Consider having groups of 2-3 members instead of 4-5. It was incredibly difficult to set up meetings with 5 different schedules. One girl dropped the class and she was the person who had all of our phone numbers and knew everyoneŐs face. We also had people pick up the slack for other people; which doesnŐt seem fair. We believe that with a group of 2-3 people, there would be less room for slack and you could probably develop a closer, more trusting relationship. We would like to do this again but with smaller groups and maybe also evaluations within the groups so people could receive different grades according to what their group thought of their individual performance.