The Case for Common Sense
John Ikerd
Professor Emeritus
University of Missouri
American farmers have been told they must specialize, mechanize, and
manage their farms like a business – it’s the logical, reasonable thing to
do. But, this logic and reason has led
to fewer farms, larger farms, and increasingly, to corporate control of
farming. Being logical and reasonable
has brought the demise of family farms and now threatens the food security of
the nation. Maybe it’s time to try
something else. Maybe it’s time for
farmers to rely on their common sense.
Our common sense is our insight
into the true nature of things – into what Plato referred to as “pure
knowledge.” Plato argued, around 400
BC, that one can never gain “pure knowledge” through observation. Anything that can be observed is always
changing, he said, but pure knowledge never changes. He argued that we observe only imperfect examples of the true
“form” of things – “form” being the order or architecture of pure
knowledge. We can observe examples of
“form” and we can visualize true “form” in our minds through insight. However, we can never actually observe
“form” – or the true order of things – because it is intangible and exists only
in the abstract.
The true nature, or “higher order,” of things never changes. Being “pure knowledge,” it is the part of
the constant reality of the universe.
We can see this higher order reflected in the world around us and in the
lives of other people. However, our
observations have meaning only because we may have some intuitive understanding
of the true order from which things emanate.
We can never gain an understanding of this higher order through
observation, because we can observe only imperfect examples. Instead, true understanding must come about by
other means – means which may be referred to as insight, intuition, or better
yet, by using our “common sense.”
Science, on the other hand, is based on logic and reason – not on
insight and intuition. Today’s science
has evolved from philosophies of more than four hundred years ago. Rene Descartes, Isaac Newton, John Locke,
and others of that time, hypothesized that the world worked like a big, complex
machine, with many intricate and interconnected parts. They reasoned that everything that happens, every
effect, must have a discernable cause.
Thus, if we formulate appropriate hypotheses concerning cause and effect
relationships, and if we design appropriate experiments or observations, we can
find the cause of every effect and acquire knowledge and understanding. The thinkers of this “age of reason” laid
the conceptual foundation for today’s dominant notions of “science.”
Many scientists today believed that through logic, reason, and
scientific observation, we can discover “truth” – we can find “true
knowledge.” Many scientists today
reject anything that cannot be “proven” empirically, through observation or
experiment, as irrational superstition.
If you can’t prove it, it simply is not true.
In relying on our common sense, we need not reject science as a means
of gaining knowledge or understanding of the things around us. But we must reject the proposition that
there is only one way of knowing or
understanding. Thomas Huxley, a noted
English botanist, once wrote, “All truth, in the long run, is only common sense
clarified.” Albert Einstein wrote, “The
whole of science is nothing more than a refinement of everyday thinking.” We must use science to “clarify and refine”
our common sense, but not allow science to replace it. We must be willing to challenge the
conventional wisdom that science is the key to all knowledge with a more
enlightened concept of science that respects common sense as our only source of
“true knowledge.”
Conventional wisdom is something fundamentally different from common sense – although the two are sometimes mistakenly used interchangeably. Both may represent widely held opinions, but the sources of those opinions are quite different. Conventional wisdom, like science, is rooted in logic and reason – in conclusions drawn from experimentation and observation. Sometimes the logic and reasoning are faulty, and thus, so are the conclusions. But even more important, “true knowledge” can never be observed – it exists only in the abstract.
Common sense is something that we know to be true, regardless of whether we have experienced or observed it ourselves or have been informed of it by others. Conventional wisdom may include some things that make common sense. However, things “make sense” to us only if we somehow know they are true – only if the truth of it is validated by the spiritual or metaphysical part of us rather than by the logical or reasoning part of us. Some people choose to deny their spirituality, and thus, their common sense, and instead rely solely on logic and reason. But, we all have access to common sense – we possess it in common. But, we are each free to use or not use it.
When the framers of the Declaration of Independence wrote, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that
among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness,” they had no scientific basis for such
an assertion. These truths were not
derived by logic and reason, and this statement certainly did not represent
conventional wisdom in those days. The
truth of this statement was something they felt in their souls. They were relying on their common sense.
There is no logical, rational reason
to accept the Golden Rule: do unto others,
as you would have them do unto you. Yet, it is a part of almost every
organized religion and every enduring philosophy in the history of the
world. It’s just common sense. When Thomas Paine wrote of “the rights of
man,” and Jimmy Carter talked of “basic human rights,” they were not relying on
exhaustive scientific experiments. They
relied instead on their common sense.
Common sense comes to all of us from somewhere beyond our body and mind
– from the spiritual part of us that allows us to glimpse the realm of the
higher order of things. We all have
access to it, but we must open our hearts and our minds to receive it. And we must accept its reality.
Our
common sense today tells us something is fundamentally wrong in American
agriculture. We are told we shouldn’t
be concerned about the current farm financial situation. The current crisis is
just a normal economic adjustment, and the free-market ultimately works for the
good of all, so they say. We are told
we shouldn’t be concerned about the natural environment, that we have no proof
we are damaging the natural ecosystem, and after all, we can find a
technological fix for any ecological problem.
We are told we shouldn’t be concerned about what is happening to family
farms and rural communities, that rural people want the same things urban
people want, and thus, they must give up their rural ways of life. But, our common sense tells us that
something is fundamentally wrong in rural America – economically, ecologically,
and socially.
Common
sense tells many farmers they would not be better off in some other occupation,
even if they could make more money.
Common sense also tells them they can’t continue to take from nature
without giving something back to nature, no matter what new technologies science
may bring. Common sense tells them that
positive relationships with other people, with their families and communities,
make their lives better, regardless of where they might choose to live.
Our
common sense tells the rest of us that we must help farmers develop farming
systems that can meet the needs of the present while leaving equal or better
opportunities for the future. Our
common sense also tells us that our food and farming systems must be ecologically
sound, economically viable, and socially responsible, if they are to be
sustainable over time. And, our common
sense tells us that an industrial, corporately controlled agriculture is not
sustainable.
Our
common sense also tells us that we can and must find ways to live and work that
nurture the personal, interpersonal, and spiritual aspects of our lives. We know that we must accept responsibility
for ourselves -- that our individual well-being is important to our quality of
life. But we know also, that caring for
other people is not a sacrifice, but instead, that compassion for others adds
to the quality of our own life. And, we
know that taking care of the land is not a sacrifice, but instead, stewardship
of the earth helps give purpose and meaning to our lives. We know the quality of our life is enhanced
when we make conscious, purposeful decisions to care for the earth and for each
other.
We need not condemn ourselves for having failed to rely on our common sense. Even the founding fathers of our country sometimes denied their common sense in favor of conventional wisdom. The rightness of owning slaves was conventional wisdom until well into the 19th century – it had always been done. Until the 20th century, women in the U.S. were denied the right to vote – the conventional wisdom: their husbands should vote for them.
Conventional wisdom today says that farms must become still
larger and fewer if farmers are to survive economically. Conventional wisdom says that agribusiness
corporations can take better care of the land than can family farmers and that
“fee markets” will ensure that all are well-fed. Conventional wisdom says that family farms and rural communities
are but nostalgic memories of a past that never was. But, the conventional wisdom concerning American agriculture is
wrong. It’s time to reject the
conventional wisdom. It’s time to use
our common sense.