Michel Foucault on Confession
From
The History of Sexuality: An Introduction, Vol. 1NY: Random, 1978; trans. Robert Hurley. French, 1976.
Since the Middle Ages at least, Western societies have established the confession as one of the main rituals we rely on for the production of truth: the codification of the sacrament of penance by the Lateran Council in 1215, with the resulting development of confessional techniques [and the decline of accusatory procedures in criminal justice, the expense of private settlements, the Inquisition] all this helped to give confession a central role in the order of civil and religious powers." 58
next to testing rituals, next to the testimony of witnesses, and the learned methods of observation and demonstration, the confession became on of the Wests most highly valued techniques for producing truth. We have since become a singularly confessing society. The confession has spread its effects far and wide. It plays a part in justice, medicine, education, family relationships, and love relations, in the most ordinary affairs of everyday life, and in the most solemn rites: one confesses ones crimes, ones sins, ones thoughts and desires, ones illnesses and troubles; one goes about telling, with the greatest precision, what is most difficult to tell. [Think of Clinton!]. One confesses in public and in private, to ones parents, ones educators, ones doctor, to those one loves; one admits to oneself, in pleasure and in pain, thing it would be impossible to tell to anyone else, the things people write books about. 59
we have passed from a pleasure to be recounted and heard, centering on the heroic or marvelous narration of "trials" of bravery or sainthood, to a literature ordered according to the infinite task of extracting from the depths of oneself, in between the words, a truth which the very form of the confession holds out like a shimmering mirage. 59
The obligation to confess is now relayed through so many different points, is so deeply ingrained in us, that we no longer perceive it as the effect of a power that constrains us; on the contrary, it seems to us that truth, lodged in our most secret nature, "demands" only to surface; that if it fails to do so, this is because a constraint hold it in place . . . and it can finally be articulated only at the price of a kind of liberation. 60
From the Christian penance to the present day, sex was a privileged theme of confession. A thing that was hidden, we are told. But what if, on the contrary, it was what, in a quite particular way, one confessed? Suppose the obligation to conceal it was but another aspect of the duty to admit to it ? What if sex in our society, on a scale of several centuries, was something that was placed within and unrelenting system of confession? The transformation of sex into discourse . . . the dissemination and reinforcement of heterogeneous sexualities, are perhaps two elements of the same deployment: they are linked together with the help of the central element of a confession that compels individuals to articulate their sexual peculiarityno matter how extreme. 61
[With Protestantism, etc. , lost ritualistic basis and yet is spread:]
It has been employed in a whole series of relationships: children and parents, students and educators, patients and psychiatrists, delinquents and experts. The motivations and effects it is expected to produce have varied, as have the forms it has taken: interrogations, consultations, autobiographical narratives, letters; they have been recorded, transcribed, assembled into dossiers, published, and commented on . . . .It is no longer a question simply of saying what was donethe sexual actand how it was done; but of reconstructing, in and around the act, the thoughts that recapitulated it, the obsessions that accompanied it, the images, desires, modulations, and quality of the pleasure that animated it. 63
19th C. altered the scope of the confession; it needed no longer to be concerned solely with what the subject wished to hide, but with what was hidden from himself, being incapable of coming to light except gradually and through the labor of a confession in which the questioneer and the questioned each had a part to play. p. 66
Last revised: Jan. 2001