
Scenes, Sequences, and Shots to Look For:
- opening sequence of shots showing
Chicago in 1909
- scene in which Tom receives a beating from his father
- the welcome home dinner for Mike
- scene where Tom and Matt commit their first armed robbery
- the scene of Prohibition eve
- the grapefruit scene
- the “I ain’t so tough” scene
- ending sequence
in which Tom appears on the doorstep
Background on Film
The film is based upon a 300-page draft of an unpublished novel
called “Beer and Blood,” written by two former street
thugs named John Bright and Kubec Glasmon. These men were first-hand
witnesses to gang rivalries in Chicago, and both of them witnessed
many of Al Capone’s murderous rampages. Darryl Zanuck, studio
head at Warner Bros., thought the story was perfectly suited to Warners’ “headline
policy” (that is, their tendency, in the 1930s, to base most
of their films’ scripts on current newspaper stories. Warner
Bros. bought the rights to “Beer and Blood” but never
published it, instead producing a tie-in novelization of the movie
plot written by an anonymous studio writer.
Edward Woods (who plays Matt Doyle) and James Cagney (who stars
as Tom Powers) actually switched roles midway through the film, based
on director William Wellman’s hunch that Cagney would make
the “better gangster.”
The film is typically paired with Little Caesar (1930)
and Scarface: Shame of a Nation (1931) as key examples of
classical gangster cinema.
Terms and Films to Know this Week
Voice-over, soundtrack, non-diegetic sound, diegetic sound, Underworld, Little
Caesar, Scarface: Shame of a Nation, Technicolor, the three-color
system, the debate over sound, contrapuntal sound, The Jazz
Singer, Vitaphone
Critical Commentary
“Although the gangster film’s story line includes criminal
activities and ‘rackets,’ the backbone of a gangster
film story is the metamorphosis of the gangster character. He will
rise spectacularly and then fall horrendously until he’s finally
destroyed” (xii).—Marilyn Yaquinto, Pump ‘Em
Full of lead: A Look at Gangsters on Film. New York: Twayne,
1998
“In ways that we do not easily or willingly define, the gangster
speaks for us, expressing that part of the American psyche which
rejects the qualities and the demands of modern life, which rejects ‘Americanism’ itself.”—Robert
Warshow, “The Gangster as Tragic Hero” (1948). In The
Immediate Experience: Movies, Comics, Theatre, and Other Aspects
of Popular Culture. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. press, 2001
“Gangster films are a socially antagonistic cinematic tradition
allied to lower-class and ethnically marginalized American interests
in the 1930s.” –Jonathan Munby, Public Enemies, Public
Heroes: Screening the Gangster from Little Caesar to Touch of Evil.
Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1999
Discussion Questions
1) Consider carefully the character of Tom Powers as a gangster
figure. Some critics have remarked that, compared to other gangsters
(such as Tony Camonte in Scarface), Tom Powers is an “ordinary” criminal,
possessed of “average” traits. Would you agree with this
assessment? If so, what marks him as “ordinary?”
2) A key component of Tom Powers’ characterization is James
Cagney’s performance. During the early 1930s, Cagney played
a number of roles in which he was either featured as a gangster [Angels
with Dirty Faces (1939) and The Roaring Twenties (1939)]
or as a character possessed of “gangsterish” traits [The
Picture Snatcher (1933) and G-Men (1935)]. What details
of his performance did you find noteworthy (consider, for example,
his physical stature, movements, dialogue, facial expressions, and
gestures). Why is Cagney so well suited to the gangster figure?
3) How does Public Enemy exemplify the above statement
by Robert Warshow that “gangster films are a socially antagonistic
cinematic tradition?” In what ways does this film criticize
American social life? Is this film meant to antagonize certain audience
members? If so, whom?
4) Many commentators have praised Public Enemy for its
documentary-like realism. Please comment on those elements of the
film that seem to exemplify this realism.
5) Consider the major female characters in this film: Tom’s
mother, Kitty, Mamie, and Gwen. How would you describe the function
of each of these characters? Based on these four characters, would
you agree with those critics who argue that gangster films betray
a pronounced misogyny toward women?
6) Consider Tom’s relationship with Kitty and Gwen. Why are
these relationships such failures? How would you describe Tom’s
attitude toward these two women? Why does Gwen disappear from the
screen after a certain point in the film?
7) Consider Tom and Matt’s friendship. What do you see as
the basis/bases for their friendship? In what ways is this friendship
related to Tom’s relationship with women?
8) One of the film’s peculiarities, according to some reviewers,
is that it doesn’t end where it should. Many have argued that
it would have been more appropriate for Public Enemy to
end with the scene where Tom, after being gunned down, proclaims “I
ain’t so tough” and falls in the gutter. Would you have
preferred for the film to end with this earlier scene? What would
have been achieved by doing so? What does the film achieve by ending
where it does?
9) Like many gangster films, ThePublic Enemy is
preoccupied with the urban street as a site of narrative action.
Discuss scenes in which this observation is particularly evident.
10) Arguably, there are four parental figures in ThePublic
Enemy: Tom’s father, Tom’s mother, Paddy Ryan,
and Putty Nose. Comment on each of these characters as parents.
11) Please discuss the character of Mike Powers, Tom’s brother.
A dutiful son, a war hero, and a consummate law-abider, Mike is nevertheless “afforded
no authority, sympathy, or appeal in the film,” according to
one reviewer. Would you agree with this observation? If not, why
not? If so, why do you think Mike is treated so unkindly by the film?
12)“The grayish tones of Dev Jenning’s photography imply
a neutrality of outlook, and it is only toward the end, when a sense
of mounting drama permits it, that the images become more expressive
and sinister.” So writes one critic on the film. Would
you agree with this assessment? If so, at which point in The
Public Enemy does the cinematography become “more expressive
and sinister?” Please single out a particular scene or sequence
to discuss.
13) The Public Enemy begins and ends with official statements
written by the film’s producers. What do these statements say?
What are the purpose and/or effect of including these statements as
framing devices for the film?