
Hitchcock Before Hollywood
Before ever coming to Hollywood, the industry for which he would
direct over thirty films and lend his image, voice, and guidance
to a successful television show, Hitchcock directed more than twenty-five
films, both silent and sound (in fact, he directed the very first
British sound film, Blackmail, in 1929). Hitchcock
began his career as a graphic artist and worked with German Expressionist
filmmakers at the Ufa studios in Babelsberg, before returning to
England to direct features. As a result, he developed a very
striking and flamboyant cinematic style that included a full range
of camera distances and angles, quick cutting, close-ups of key props,
point-of-view shots, and sexually suggestive symbolism. While
he enjoyed the sound-image relationship, Hitchcock always favored “pure
cinema”: the use of the camera, mise-en-scène, and editing
to tell a story.
The commercial and critical success of Hitchcock’s early British
films drew the attention of both American audiences and Hollywood
producers. David O. Selznick started courting Hitchcock in
the late thirties and went to great lengths to sign him to his newly
founded independent production company, Selznick International Pictures. Selznick
considered Hitchcock an attractive commodity for two primary reasons:
1. Hitchcock’s name alone had commercial clout. He was
a director-star, meaning that audiences were as much, if not more,
drawn to his films due to his name on the marquee than the names
of the actors and actresses. 2. Hitchcock was a producer-director. He
was capable of seeing a production from its inception through post-production
and release. This appealed to Selznick whose time was currently
taken up by a little film called Gone With the Wind. The
most appropriate contemporary comparison to Hitchcock’s status
as director-star and producer-director is Steven Spielberg whose
name alone sells pictures to the movie-going public.
Key Terms, People, and Concepts
Pre-sold properties, David O. Selznick, prestige film, production
values, previews (or test screenings), B-film, backlot, storyboard,
flashback, voice-over narration, high-key lighting, “three-point” lighting
system (key light, fill light, and backlight), “race cinema,” Josef
Von Sternberg, John Ford, Howard Hawks
Elements to Look and Listen For
- Hitchcock’s cameo
- Uses of non-diegetic music
- Production values
- Visual representations of the disempowerment of the female
protagonist
Interesting Facts
Rebecca is the only Hitchcock film ever to win the Oscar
for Best Picture, and although Hitchcock was nominated that year
for Best Director, he did not win, nor did he win Best Director the
four subsequent times he was nominated [Lifeboat (1944), Spellbound (1945), Rear
Window (1954), and Psycho (1960)]. It wasn’t
until the 1968 Academy Awards that Hitchcock received an Oscar. His
acceptance speech for that year’s Irving G. Thalburg Memorial
Award for life-achievement consisted of two words: “Thank
you.” Then he turned and unceremoniously walked off stage.
Joe Breen, censor for the Production Code, told Selznick: “There
must be no suggestion whatever of a perverted relationship between
Mrs. Danvers and Rebecca. If any possible hint of this creeps
into [the film], we will of course not be able to approve the picture.”
Because star Laurence
Olivier wanted his then-girlfriend Vivien
Leigh (the star of Selznick’s triumphant success Gone
With the Wind from the previous year) to play the lead role,
he treated Joan Fontaine horribly.
This shook Fontaine up quite a bit, so Alfred
Hitchcock decided to capitalize on this by telling her that
everyone on the set hated her, thus making her shy and uneasy on
the set—just what Hitchcock wanted from her performance.
Hitchcock is famous for, among many things, his near 1:1 ratio
of filmed footage to footage in the final product. This means
that Hitch’s preparation for shooting a film was so thorough
that he rarely shot anything not preplanned. This includes
establishing shots, close-ups, alternative angles, and even, to an
extent, multiple takes. In Hollywood, directors average a 15:1,
even 20:1 ratio of filmed footage to what ultimately makes the final
product.
Commentary
“Rebecca may be the most straightforward film in the Hitchcock
canon, a fact due entirely to Selznick’s insistence on strict
adherence to the novel.”—Donald Spoto, The Art of
Alfred Hitchcock
“There are two, and only two, important types of manpower
in motion pictures, and they are equally rare: the great top executive
and the great individual picture-maker.” —David O. Selznick
Notable Hitchcock films produced in Hollywood:
Suspicion (1941), Shadow
of a Doubt (1943), Spellbound (1945), Notorious (1946), Rope (1948), Strangers
on a Train (1951), Rear Window (1954), The Man
Who Knew Too Much (1956), Vertigo (1958), North
By Northwest (1959), Psycho (1960), The Birds (1963), Marnie (1964), Frenzy (1972).
Notable films produced by David O. Selznick:
The
Four Feathers (Merian C. Cooper, 1929), Bird of Paradise (King
Vidor, 1932), The Most Dangerous Game (Irving Pichel
and Ernest B. Schoedsack, 1932), Christopher Strong (Dorothy
Arzner, 1933), King Kong (Merian C. Cooper and Ernest
B. Schoedsack, 1933), Reckless (Victor Fleming, 1936), Gone
With the Wind (Victor Fleming, 1939), Spellbound (Hitchcock,
1945), Duel in the Sun (Vidor, 1946), The Paradine
Case (Hitchcock, 1947), The Third Man (Carol Reed,
1949).
Notable films adapted from Daphne du Maurier’s fiction:
Jamaica
Inn (Hitchcock, 1939), My Cousin Rachel (Henry
Koster, 1952), The Scapegoat (Robert Hamer, 1959), The Birds (Hitchcock,
1963), Don’t Look Now (Nicholas Roeg, 1973).
Discussion Questions
1. In what way does Rebecca exemplify an A-list film,
or prestige production? What elements of the film’s narrative
and/or style do you find characteristic of a classical Hollywood
prestige film?
2. Consider one recent recipient of the Academy
Award for Best Picture, for instance last years Million Dollar
Baby, or films such as Gladiator, Titanic, American
Beauty, Forrest Gump, or Silence of the Lambs, etc. How
does the film compare to Rebecca as Best Picture winner? Could
the film be classified as a prestige film? Explain why or why
not.
3. Hitchcock said of this film: “Well, it’s
not a Hitchcock picture, it’s a novellete, really. The
story is old-fashioned; there was a whole school of feminine literature
at the period, and though I’m not against it, the fact is that
the story is lacking in humor.” Hitchcock seems to be
critical of a “typically feminine” literature (and cinema). What
might he be referring to? Is Rebecca a “feminine” film? How
might Rebecca be designed for a female audience?
4. Why is Rebecca never shown in the film? Hitchcock
was adamant about avoiding any obvious flashbacks to reveal the “real” Rebecca. Why
do you think he made this decision?
5. Many critics have pointed out that the heroine’s
first name is never revealed, both in the novel and the film. Why
not? Is there a thematic of ideological motivation?
6. Hitchcock claimed that Manderley (the de Winter mansion) is
really a “character” in the film. What does he mean
by this? Consider how the characters interact with Manderley,
especially our heroine. How do editing, camera movement and mise-en-scéne “place” our
heroine in her new home? How might Manderley’s fate be
thematically significant?